NOTICE UNDER SECTION 420 OF THE CHEAP-LIKE PHOTOGRAPHERS ACT 2010 FOR RESOLUTION OF VOMIT-INDUCING PICTURES

In the matter of

All Facebook Photographers Taking Bad Pictures and Giving Terrible Captions

An extraordinarily boring general meeting of ALL Facebook Photographers was uselessly convened and held at Your Typical Sketchy Restaurant and Hotel on 07-10-2017 to discuss the issue of Facebook Photographers taking bad pictures and giving terrible captions. The matter was not resolved as Facebook Photographers were busy taking nonsense pictures and then digitally manipulating them to make them worse than they were. As evidence of this behaviour, an Instagram post was retained wherein a photographer took a picture of a cup of tea and changed the tea's colour to mimic the skin of a tiger, highlighting the steam coming from the cup, and adding the caption, "Sundarbans is burning". At this point, the photographer mentally patted himself on the back and expected this to be his only and greatest contribution to saving the natural forest. 

Another piece of evidence was presented of a photographer who goes around taking pictures of people he calls "poor". He then produces a badly-written and 100 percent made-up narrative to go along with his picture. Before posting, he cleans up the image, adds a few installed filters, and then pretends to empathise with his subject who has by now turned into his victim. 

A third piece of evidence was 600 pictures of nothing but the sky and cloud-formations, with captions such as "Cameras cannot capture true beauty; Registered Photographers can"; "The majesty of the sky is a reflection of the majesty of my camera's eyes,"; and other very stupid, neckbeard-y lines. 

Finally, the last evidence was that of a photographer taking a picture of feeding people who clearly did not want to become a photo-op and PR stunt, and a caption reading, "How good it feels to care." This was deemed to be extremely superficial behaviour akin to tossing meat to "poor" people as expression of your generosity after the holy slaughter of animals you did not slaughter. 

This gazette is to inform that such practices as aforementioned will result in barring those guilty from the Registered Photographers club, an elite club where if you become a part you can get great wedding event offers because what else can you lot do? 

On a side note, it was said that any Registered Photographer that makes a statement but ends with a question mark to highlight his intellect will also be removed because such douchebag behaviour is not palatable. An instance was of a photographer replying to a question no one had asked him by stating, "I don't see why this sucks?" Why did he use a darn question mark when expressing a thought? How incredibly stupid is that. I want to tear my hair out, make a collage from them, and then sell it to a hair-oil company as an art installment, because that is how much all this bothers me. Also, while we are here, instead of posting graphic pictures of injured animals that need rescuing to satisfy your own lack of self-worth and urging us to help, why not do it yourself?

All concerned are therefore, requested to not contact us regarding any of these things but to stop being pretentious little shizzzz. 

MR. PRITHIBI SHOZA

CHAIRMAN

COOL REGISTERED PHOTOGRAPHERS OF BANGLADESH